Voting in “off” year elections

by Peter Walz — last modified Oct 04, 2007 04:39 PM
Filed Under:

What do we do about so called “off year” elections? Wikipedia describes an off year election as:

"[...] elections [that] rarely feature any election to a national office, few state legislative elections, and very few gubernatorial elections. The vast majority of these elections are held at the municipal level. On the ballot are many mayors, a wide variety of citizen initiatives in various states, and many more local public offices." 

Generally, voter turnout is horrible in off year elections, even though these offices probably have a much greater impact on our daily lives.  These local officials will be making decisions like whether to build a park in your neighborhood, create a greenway in your county, or approve plans for a Super Wal-Mart to be built two blocks down from the “regular” Wal-Mart (as my town council did recently).

I wonder sometimes if we wouldn’t be better off with having all elections in even years. On the one hand, we’d certainly have more people voting for these important local races.  Of course, on the other hand, with voters considering candidates for the White House, Senate, Congress, Governor, and state legislature, maybe they local races would be totally off of a voter’s radar.

Do you have any ideas to improve voter turnout in off year elections? And are you voting this year?  


Filed under: ,

Comments (4)

Mike Heaney Oct 05, 2007 10:14 AM

The only thing with a lower turnout than an off-year election is a runoff election in an off-year - typically around 3% or less. This year's pilot program in a few municipalities including Cary & High Point should help. Instant runoff elections may not improve turnout for the original vote count, but at least they ensure that the final selection is made by at least the number of original voters, not just the select few who go to the polls twice. Hopefully instant runoff elections will go statewide in 2009.

Anonymous User Oct 10, 2007 06:57 PM

I'm a grad student at Duke, and despite years of education and having lived in many states, I have a hard time figuring out how to vote, when to vote, where to vote, and for whom I would like to vote. I've done some research and found a few websites that were helpful last year, but I remember it took me quite awhile to figure out what elections were happening for my town and how to get information to make an educated decision on who to vote for. Perhaps if the Conservation Network wrote a "Local Voting 101" page (and sent it with the "register to vote now" email), or directed us toward a link or two that provide very basic information on these issues, that would be very helpful.

Thanks.

Peter Oct 11, 2007 06:56 PM

Getting information on all the candidates and issues is not always easy. There several sources I'd recommend: - find out what offices you're voting for by going to your county board of election website and viewing a sample ballot: http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/about/directors.asp - if the website isn't helpful, call them and ask what offices will be on your ballot. (I called this year because it wasn't clear to me and they answered my questions in 2 minutes.) - research the candidates: one of the best resources are the candidates and parties themselves.(the two major party websites are NC Democrats: www.ncdp.org and the NC Republicans: www.ncgop.org) - Next you might try media such as local newspapers who report on the campaigns and sometimes endorse candidates on the editorial page. Here's a list of NC news media: www.usnpl.com/ncnews.php - You might also look at who else has endorsed the candidates. Sometimes it is helpful to see who is financing the campaigns (i.e. if a special interest group is heavily behind a campaign you have a good sense of that candidate's values). Often the media write stories about campaign financing before election day. - Is there one great place for non-partisan information about candidates? not really. Especially for local elections - you have to do a little more work sometimes. Ususally the biggest difference between local candidates is their position on growth and development. Here are a couple of good websites for information on statewide, Presidential, and Congressional campaigns: - http://www.cqpolitics.com/ - http://www.vote-smart.org/

Also - contact the campaigns for literature or even ask to talk with the candidate. I even had my state representative come to my house to meet and talk after I called her camapign a few years ago.

Good luck!

John Shaw Oct 14, 2007 01:29 AM

Tuesday's "off year" municipal election changed direction of growth in Cary, N. C. It is not an exaggeration to say that the voters in Cary took back the town from developers.

Mayor Ernie McAlister, supported by developers and real estate interests, was defeated by Harold Weinbrecht, a supporter of managing and controlling growth. Weinbrecht won by 58 percent, even though McAlister out spent Weinbrecht by about 5 to1. Most of McAlister's contributions came from developers, many who lived out of town (even out of state).

What made the difference was the large grass roots support for Harold Weinbrecht. The Weinbrecht volunteers vastly outnumbered the volunteers for the incumbent mayor. They included members of Weinbrecht's campaign committee, members of the Davis-High House organization (organized to fight a development at that intersection), and volunteers for the Democratic party (which endorsed Weinbrecht even though this was a non-partisan election). The Sierra Club’s local group endorsed Weinbrecht and helped in the campaign.

Erv Portman, an incumbent at-large council member who received support from the same groups, easily beat off a challenger who had developer support.

Had this been an even year election, many of the large number of volunteers would have also been volunteering for "up ballot" national and state candidates. Many of them would not have been able to spend the time that they were able to spend in the municipal only election. However, the expensive mailings and TV ads by the developer funded candidates would have continued. These were people primarily involved in funding local elections in order to obtain easy rezoning and site plan approval.

An even year election would have seen a higher turnout, but it is very likely that the voters (particularly those who only vote in even years) would have paid little attention to the important local issue of slowing the conversion of farms and forests into housing developments and shopping centers.

Let's continue to keep municipal elections on odd years. This year Cary showed that strong grass roots campaigning on important issues will improve voter turnout.

John Shaw Cary, NC

about blog

As of February 10, 2010, the NCCN blog has moved solely to our Facebook page. Please check us out there!

The NC Conservation Network blog is about the issues, events, people, and news that affect North Carolina’s environment...

More...