NCC Personal tools

Goodbye, water bottles

by fawn — last modified Jan 14, 2008 11:55 PM
Filed Under: toxics

I finally threw away my Nalgene bottles last week after clinging to them for years, despite the warnings from environmental scientists that the polycarbonate plastic bottles contained nasty chemicals called endocrine disruptors. I love my Nalgene bottles. They’re indestructible, convenient, and have probably saved me thousands of purchases of bottled water. So despite the gnawing doubts, I’ve kept on using them. But last week I read a new study that put the final nail in the coffin, at least as far as I’m concerned.

We’ve known for a long time that polycarbonate plastic contains a chemical called Bisphenol-A (BPA). BPA is the quintessential endocrine disruptor. (An endocrine disruptor is a pollutant that can mimic hormones in the human body. The pollutant can plug into the body’s hormone receptors and scramble the critical growth & development signals that hormones carry, increasing risks for all kinds of health problems, from cancer to fertility to obesity.

The argument has been over whether or not the polycarbonate plastic bottles leach BPA into drinking water under normal conditions. The evidence is pretty strong that super-heating bottles or exposing them to harsh detergents releases BPA. But what happens to drinking water under normal use conditions?

A team of researchers at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine recently put that question to the test in a new study. They bought brand new Nalgene bottles at a camping store, and got a bunch of rock climbers at the local climbing gym to donate some used ones. They found that at room temperature, the bottles steadily leached measurable amounts of BPA into the drinking water (measurable in ng/hour). The longer the water sat in the bottles, the more BPA they could measure in the water. They even used a standard test to confirm that the levels of BPA they were measuring mimicked the toxic action of estrogen to developing cerebellar neurons. Filling the bottles with just-boiled water (as many of us are wont to do while camping) dramatically increased the migration of BPA into the water by as much as 55-fold.

Several previous studies have also looked at BPA migration from polycarbonate infant formula bottles, food and beverage containers. The upshot is that we are exposed to endocrine disruptors, including BPA, from a wide variety of sources, and each of them contributes to our total burden of exposure throughout our lives. While this particular study doesn’t say that you can pin your health problems on your water bottle, the authors strongly state that they are one component of our total exposure to endocrine disruptors. Some of these exposures you can’t really change – at least not without changing environmental regulations. But many of them can be changed – starting with pitching the polycarbonate water bottle.

PS: Need suggestions for a replacement bottle? I carry around an old Gatorade bottle that I refill with water (just avoid bottles with a #3 or #7 on the bottom). You can also find lightweight stainless steel or enameled aluminum bottles at some health food and sporting goods stores.

why no 3 and 7?

Posted by Amelia at Jan 17, 2008 06:52 PM

Thanks Fawn!! I've had the same nagging thoughts about my nalgenes, but haven't taken the plunge to get rid of them yet. But now I think I will. One question - why are number 3 and 7 plastic bottles bad? Is it becasue they contain the same bad chemical or is it that they contain another bad chemical?

Re: why no 3 and 7?

Posted by fawn at Jan 18, 2008 04:11 PM
Oops, I guess I should have explained that. #3 is PVC - polyvinyl chloride. Different, also bad chemical (the little mnemonic device for that one is "Bad news comes in threes"). #7 is "other," which could be many different things (or a blend of things), including polycarbonate plastic.

Bad Nalgene

Posted by Mike at Jan 22, 2008 01:52 PM

Nalgene sells water bottles made of HDPE (High-density polyethylene). There not clear they're white. This is the the proper plastic for food storage.

Re: Bad Nalgene

Posted by fawn at Jan 23, 2008 04:59 PM
Nalgene does also make HDPE water bottles (the non-clear ones). The researchers tested those too, and they release much much lower levels of BPA into the water (though they do still release BPA).

target the plastic, not the brand name

Posted by Anonymous User at Jan 28, 2008 03:05 PM

Your post doesn't make it clear to the many who aren't familiar with this issue that the problem plastic is what is more commonly known as Lexan, and not the producer, Nalgene. This material is widely used, even in non-sports containers, like...travel coffee mugs! (more hot water). The safest and most recommended plastic is LDPE #4 (which Nalgene also makes). Safest to the extent that any petroleum by-product is safe for us to regularly drink out of. On the other hand, while there is proof that Lexan leaches chemicals into the container contents, there is less agreement about how our bodies treat it: many people still contend that we just flush it out. Personally, it's not a risk I'm willing to take, but that information should also be mentioned.

switch to glass bottles

Posted by Anonymous User at May 01, 2009 02:47 AM

I am not completely sure if it is really the numbers on the bottles that determine whether they are safe to drink out of or not. I have read many posts and I am nearly sure that any plastic leaches chemicals. Aluminum is sometimes lined with plastic and therefore the switch is pointless. Switch to glass. Glass is timeless. If you want to check out a great reusable glass water bottle go to http://livinglavidaverde.net/store.aspx . There are no chemical dangers with regard to glass. Go there, I think you will be happy you did.

about blog

As of February 10, 2010, the NCCN blog has moved solely to our Facebook page. Please check us out there!

The NC Conservation Network blog is about the issues, events, people, and news that affect North Carolina’s environment...

More...




 
Site by ifPeople
<