Study released on toxic plastic contaminant
by
Mindy Hiteshue
—
last modified
Aug 28, 2007 04:34 PM
Filed Under:
toxics
general
Like a good little environmentalist, I can be seen throughout the streets of Raleigh toting my green Nalgene bottle with my "treehugger" sticker. This reusable and washable bottle keeps me from having to buy bottled water while I'm out and about (many say bottled water is a waste of money and is definitely a waste of natural resources in making the plastic and transporting the bottles). But, like most things in life, there are rarely perfect solutions to large problems. Just last week, the LA Times ran an article regarding Bisphenol A (BPA)--a highly toxic component of specific types of plastic used in baby bottles, water supply pipes, bottle tops, and--you guessed it--Nalgene bottles. According to Dr. Jennifer Sass, senior scientist in the Natural Resources Defense Council's (NRDC) Health and Environment Program,
The Times article focused on a recent study done by the Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (part of the National Institutes of Health) which studied the affects of BPA and concluded that "they had 'some concern' about neurological and behavioral effects in fetuses, infants and children, but 'minimal' or 'negligible' concern about reproductive effects." The NRDC, in a press release last week, expressed their own concerns with the Center's conclusions:
If you're interested in reducing your exposure to BPA, take the pledge to, at the very least, keep toxic Bisphenol A out of Nalgene plastics. Visit http://ecopledge.com/detoxnalgene/ to let your voice be heard today! alternative to nalgene
Posted by
Terri
at
Sep 05, 2007 09:40 PM
I haven't purchased one of these yet, but they sound like good alternatives to our dearly departed nalgene bottles: http://www.mysigg.com/ |
NC Conservation Network on Facebook
|

more scientific comment on BPA
The LA Times just reported on an additional statement from a panel of independent & government scientists (published in the Journal of Reproductive Toxicology) that criticizes the NIEHS report and goes much further in its warnings about BPA: "The scientists, including four from federal health agencies, reviewed about 700 studies before concluding that people are exposed to levels of the chemical exceeding those that harm lab animals. Infants and fetuses are most vulnerable, they said." Here's a link to the full story: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003819420_plastics03.html?syndication=rss